Time Magazine's controversial cover photo portrays a mother breastfeeding her nearly four year old child. The article is on 'attachment parenting', which consists of three main tenets: extended breastfeeding, baby 'wearing' in slings, and co-sleeping.
My reaction to this photo is anger, not because of the breastfeeding- but the implication that if I am not breastfeeding my children until preschool that I am not "Mom Enough". I do not understand why women continue to chastize each other for the choices that we all make. Mothers do what works best for their family- and clearly breastfeeding works best for this family.
Breastfeeding was a struggle for me. In fact, my milk never fully came in with my first- which was extremely frustrating. I had to go back to work when he was 6 weeks old, so I stopped breastfeeding even before that. It does not work for everyone, for a variety of reasons. But I do not feel that anyone should be looked down upon for not choosing that method!
Time Magazine was obviously sensationalizing this topic, and I do not appreciate it. I wish they had not cast 'attachment parenting' as such an extreme method. I have serious concerns with co-sleeping, and I think it is a difficult habit to break. But the general idea that a mother wants to bond with her child is not extreme!! I wish that a variety of motherhood choices were supported by society. Isn't that the definition of freedom? We need to stop judging each other! http://wp.me/p1AbH5-1I
How does this photo make you feel?
I completely agree! I practice attachment parenting. BUT that doesn't mean that think other moms should practice it or that it is the only style that works.
ReplyDeleteI HATE that cover, not because of the photo. But because of the title. What a catty thing to say! When are mothers going to become a team instead of working against one another?
My sentiments EXACTLY!
ReplyDeleteI hate the cover, it makes me not want to read the article at all. I may have only breastfed for 5 weeks, but I'm definitely mom enough!
ReplyDeleteIf the intent was to anger mothers, then they accomplished their goal!
ReplyDelete